How does the environment benefit from solar energy technology?

When you install solar panels on your home, you help to combat greenhouse gas emissions and global warming and reduce dependence on fossil fuel.


As a homeowner or a business owner, when you install solar panels on your property or place of business, you help combat greenhouse gas emissions which are a primary cause of global warming, and you contribute to reducing our collective dependence on fossil fuels.

Producing electricity from solar panels rather than burning fossil fuels offers significant public health benefits.

Coal and natural gas plants cause air and water pollution which has been directly linked to breathing problems, neurological damage, heart attacks, and cancer, just to name a few.

Efficiency or the environment? Choose both. Go green.
Efficiency or the environment? Choose both. Go green.

Research in the United States has proven that replacing fossil fuels with renewable sources of producing energy like solar power has reduced premature mortality and overall healthcare costs in many states.

To review this in a better perspective, the negative economic impact caused by using fossil fuels to produce energy is estimated at between $361.7 and $886.5 billion, or between 2.5 percent and 6 percent of gross domestic product (GDP); according to a publication titled Economic value of U.S. fossil fuel electricity health impacts.

This is stunning!

Producing energy using solar panels have no direct association with air pollution emissions.

Some might even go further to state that solar energy requires essentially no water to operate and does not pollute water resources or strain supply by competing with agriculture, drinking water systems, or other essential water needs.

Fossil fuels mining practices, however, can have significant negative impacts on water resources due to environmentally destructive mining processes that cause deforestation, excavated mountains and pollute water resources.

More Stories From Around the Web:

  1. Interesting and highly relevant study, but why does the PVBuzz|Media article not give the full citation so that interested readers can examine the original publication, or at least look at the abstract? It should also have been pointed out that the study was actually done in 2012 and published in early 2013. Of course, the main results remain totally valid, and the situation is unlikely to have improved in the last four years.
    Economic value of U.S. fossil fuel electricity health impacts
    B Machol and S Rizk, Environ Int. 2013 Feb;52:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.03.003
    Although the full paper is behind a paywall, one can always contact the authors via email and request a free pdf.

    1. @Tom Mommsen: Thanks for the added information and for the article reference.

Comments are closed.

What to Read Next:

4 images that make you want a Net-Zero home in Ontario

[caption id="attachment_75624" align="aligncenter" width="600"] A net-zero home in London, Ontario, Canada /SIFTON PROPERTIES[/caption] This featured net-zero home opened in London,...

Solar Panel Efficiency: Why it matters

Solar panel efficiency improvements often capture the news headlines as new potential technology advances offer greater energy production in less...

Tech giants, Apple and Google rush to 100 percent renewables

In what seemed to be an orchestrated rush towards some virtual finish line, the world's top tech giants, Apple and...

Using solar to power eco-friendly outdoor performances

Art is at its most powerful when it inspires its viewers into action—and when the artist’s message revolves around alternative...

Community solar opens new markets

Community solar installations extend the benefits of owning a solar system while removing some of the limitations. These shared renewable...